A Language Older Than Words

A Language Older Than Words Response Paper In the novel A Language Older Than Words, Derrick Jensen covers a wide range of subjects in the numerous parts that he has isolated his book into. The two sections that truly intrigued me were Breaking Out and Economics. The two topics that Jensen talks about is simply the relationship with the and different just as the money related image in our general public individually. I had the option to identify with both of these subjects in various manners. In the part Breaking Out Jensen centers around the picture of oneself and the relationship we have with each other.Jensen expounds on how we are choked to our own inhumane imprisonment in our general public. It's anything but a genuine inhumane imprisonment yet it is a death camp from our perspective and developing the picture of ourselves and our relationship as individuals. â€Å"In an inhumane imprisonment, it is better (regarding keeping up genuine life; otherworldly life is an altogether e xtraordinary inquiry) to be the executioner than the murdered, preferred to be a colleague over a resister, a gatekeeper than a partner, a manager than a watchman, better still to be the chief (125). He expresses that having everybody act in their own wellbeing may not be the wellbeing for society when all is said in done. â€Å"Part of the explanation we’ve had the option to persuade ourselves that by abusing others we’re acting in our own wellbeing is that we’ve acknowledged a seriously choked meaning of self (125). † Jensen talks about how the picture of our self isn't the picture that we ought to acknowledge. We should break out of that inhumane imprisonment that society has developed and make our own perspective on what kind of individual we need to be without the assistance of society or the dread of society passing judgment on ones self.The quote that Jensen expounded on the death camp truly strokes a harmony in my mind. My own investigation of thi s is we are stuck as a general public by continually needing to be the best and not paying special mind to other people. The attitude of all men for themselves has spread in our general public. I was thinking we are continually contending throughout everyday life. Regardless of whether it is for an occupation or a spot in a class, we are continually contending. This opposition makes this attitude that it is smarter to be the executioner than the killed.The choked meaning of the self that Jensen talks about identifies with the exercise manual from class. At the point when it talks about sexuality and how there isn’t simply male or female when there are a wide range of shades of the rainbow. As a general public we shouldn’t must be contracted to what they need us to relate to. We have to break out of our ‘concentration camp’ and make our own character without the assistance of society making a decision about us. In the section Economics, Jensen expounds on t he way that cash rules all.He talks about how everything in life transforms into a cash trade. â€Å"I’d like three books, two bundles of chicken McNuggets, and a hit to go, if it's not too much trouble That which it is conceivable to lessen to an item and sell, is. That which can’t, is either (by definition) depreciated, disregarded, or essentially wrecked (139)†. Jensen is attempting to show the peruser that everything has a connection to cash. We need cash so as to do the numerous things in life, for example, travel yet there are things that we don’t need cash for. Here’s the issue: in this clean universe of financial classes, there’s no space for affection, delight, riddle, for the occasionally befuddled and confounding, some of the time clear and explaining, in some cases excellent, once in a while mystical attractions of body on body, skin on skin soul on soul (139). †How I see this statement is that Jensen is stating we are so e xpended in getting more cash that we don’t possess energy for the things that truly matter in our life like love and joy. I can see where Jensen is coming from. I think our general public is stuck into imagining that cash is a priority.I think it is significant in light of the fact that we do require cash to endure yet we shouldn’t let cash run our lives. The primary statement shows how we consider cash to be a limitation to satisfaction, love, and riddle. This helps me to remember the conversation that we had in class on how we might want to venture to the far corners of the planet when we graduate yet we can't as a result of the imperative of cash and getting left behind in this ‘rat race’. We have every one of these commitments in a steady progression that we can't seek after the things we truly need to.Jensen carries a great deal of good inquiries to mind while perusing his novel. He isn't reluctant to state what he accepts is going on to our general p ublic despite the fact that it appears as though our general public is degenerate. His idea on connections opens up my window to realizing how effectively individuals can ‘stab’ each other in the back so as to be the executioner not the murdered. His subject of cash in our general public shows how we are really materialistic. We should give everything a dollar esteem and in the event that it doesn’t have a dollar esteem, at that point it isn't esteemed. What amount is satisfaction?